On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:18:02AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:06:23PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote: > > The top level drm Kconfig is a bit messy at the moment. Most of the drm > > drivers have their own Kconfig files, but a few have their Kconfig files > > in the top level Kconfig option itself. > > > > Create new Kconfig files for drivers that don't have one. This cleans up > > the Kconfig quite a bit > > > > Archit Taneja (10): > > drm/tdfx: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > > drm/r128: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > > drm/radeon: clean up: move config option to driver's own Kconfig file > > drm/amdgpu: clean up: move config option to driver's own Kconfig file > > drm/i810: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > > drm/mga: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > > drm/sis: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > > drm/via: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > > drm/savage: clean up: create a separate Kconfig file > > drm/misc: clean up: group device specific Kconfigs > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 116 ++++++------------------------------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/Kconfig | 19 ++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/i810/Kconfig | 8 +++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/mga/Kconfig | 8 +++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/r128/Kconfig | 8 +++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/Kconfig | 21 +++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/savage/Kconfig | 7 +++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/sis/Kconfig | 8 +++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/tdfx/Kconfig | 6 ++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/via/Kconfig | 6 ++ > > 10 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i810/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/mga/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/r128/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/savage/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/sis/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/tdfx/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/via/Kconfig > > Looking at the current state of the top-level Kconfig file, I think it'd > be a good idea to sort it in some way once this series has been merged. > There are a bunch of options that are interleaved in completely non- > intuitive ways. > > I'm not sure what the best ordering would be, but I'd suggest to at > least order them alphabetically. I think it'd also make sense to > separate out panel and bridge drivers so that they are listed at the > very bottom. > > Perhaps also splitting legacy drivers and modesetting drivers might be > useful, though perhaps a little discriminatory... I ended up patching things while writing this, so I'll just wait until these patches have landed, rebase on top of them and send out a proposal. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
