On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 11:43, Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Vinod, > > > On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 00:52, Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Add new compatible for BAM DMA engine version v1.7.4 which is > > found on Qualcomm SM6115 and QCM2290 SoCs. Since its very similar > > to v1.7.0 used on SM8150 like SoCs, mark the comptible scheme > > accordingly. > > > > While at it, also update qcom,bam-dma bindings to add comments > > which describe the BAM DMA versions used in SM8150 and SM8250 SoCs. > > This provides an easy reference for identifying the actual BAM DMA > > version available on Qualcomm SoCs. > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml | 20 ++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml > > index f1ddcf672261..c663b6102f50 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml > > @@ -15,13 +15,19 @@ allOf: > > > > properties: > > compatible: > > - enum: > > - # APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM8960 > > - - qcom,bam-v1.3.0 > > - # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084 > > - - qcom,bam-v1.4.0 > > - # MSM8916 and SDM845 > > - - qcom,bam-v1.7.0 > > + oneOf: > > + - enum: > > + # APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM8960 > > + - qcom,bam-v1.3.0 > > + # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084 > > + - qcom,bam-v1.4.0 > > + # MSM8916, SDM630 > > + - qcom,bam-v1.7.0 > > + - items: > > + - enum: > > + # SDM845, SM6115, SM8150, SM8250 and QCM2290 > > + - qcom,bam-v1.7.4 > > + - const: qcom,bam-v1.7.0 > > > > clocks: > > maxItems: 1 > > -- > > 2.38.1 > > Bjorn has applied the dts patches from this series to his tree. > As suggested by him, can you please pick patches [PATCH 1/11] and > [PATCH 2/11] from this series via the 'dmaengine' tree. > > Seems some Cc fields got messed up while sending the patchset, so > Cc'ing the dmaengine list again. Ping. Any updates on these two patches? Thanks.
