On 5.06.2023 09:08, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> The "smd-edge"s for remote processors are typically specified below the
> remoteproc nodes. For some reason apq8064 also has them all listed in a
> top-level /smd node, disabled by default. None of the boards enable them.
>
> Right now apq8064 only has support for WCNSS/riva, but there the
> smd-edge is already defined with the same interrupt etc below the
> riva-pil node.
>
> Drop these redundant definitions since the /smd top-level node is now
> deprecated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Hm, 2012 is calling.. it wants it dead code back!
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Konrad
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 40 -------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> index d2289205ff81..e0adf237fc5c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
> @@ -226,46 +226,6 @@ smem {
> hwlocks = <&sfpb_mutex 3>;
> };
>
> - smd {
> - compatible = "qcom,smd";
> -
> - modem-edge {
> - interrupts = <0 37 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> -
> - qcom,ipc = <&l2cc 8 3>;
> - qcom,smd-edge = <0>;
> -
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> -
> - q6-edge {
> - interrupts = <0 90 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> -
> - qcom,ipc = <&l2cc 8 15>;
> - qcom,smd-edge = <1>;
> -
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> -
> - dsps-edge {
> - interrupts = <0 138 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> -
> - qcom,ipc = <&sps_sic_non_secure 0x4080 0>;
> - qcom,smd-edge = <3>;
> -
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> -
> - riva-edge {
> - interrupts = <0 198 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> -
> - qcom,ipc = <&l2cc 8 25>;
> - qcom,smd-edge = <6>;
> -
> - status = "disabled";
> - };
> - };
> -
> smsm {
> compatible = "qcom,smsm";
>
>
