On Mon, 29 May 2023 14:46:57 +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> MSM8916 and MSM8939 are very similar and almost fully "pin-compatible",
> so there are some devices that exist in very similar variants with both
> MSM8916 and MSM8939. To allow sharing definitions for such devices the
> SoCs should be set up as similar as possible, e.g. using the same
> labels. At least for me this will also simplify maintenance and review
> because board DTs do not behave and/or look subtly different.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Rename &msmgpio -> &tlmm
commit: 41e22c2ff38eaea777f1158071539e659aa7980d
[2/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
commit: c310ca82e229124e7b373125d82ea8fdbf2f9f81
[3/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Use consistent name for I2C/SPI pinctrl
commit: fdfc21f65023dbbfe11dcd8f106230668ba8d9e5
[4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Clean up MDSS labels
commit: 835f939501769253eb7eb2dc5389b8592a63a3ed
[5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8916: Rename &wcd_codec -> &pm8916_codec
commit: 274cf2bdd6c94da2bf293f5a6c9a5f712dd4b01e
[6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Move aliases to boards
commit: 154f23a8d70cd39158cfdcfb71c112f687352da4
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
