On 27.05.2023 08:05, Yassine Oudjana wrote: > > On Fri, May 26 2023 at 10:36:32 PM +02:00:00, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On 26.05.2023 22:21, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >>> On 26/05/2023 21:19, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:05:47PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >>>>> On 26/05/2023 20:46, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>>>>> + - power-domain-names >>>>>> Why is this now required? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Conor. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Its an accurate description of the power/clock tree to have the top power >>>>> domain be switched on prior to the clocks that depend on it. >>>> >>>> But what does that have to do with the *names* now being required? >>> >>> oh the names >>> >>> no toss that >> this should be >> >> if:properties:compatible:blahblahmsm8996:then:required:power-domain-names > > The only compatible in this binding is qcom,msm8996-camss, so what would this achieve? You're right - I didn't notice and assumed it was a camss-common one. Konrad > >> >> Konrad >>> >>>> >>>>> I think Yassine, you could probably include the majority of your >>>>> cover-letter text in this commit to explain this change a bit better. >>>> >>>> I think it would be good to have that regardless. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Conor. >>>> >>>>> bod >>>> ^^^ I've been trying not to think about rugby since the weekend :( >>> >>> Pockets O'Gara should have his paddy papers rescinded > >
