[CCing the regression list, as it should be in the loop for regressions: https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.html] On 15.05.23 16:53, Amit Pundir wrote: > This reverts commit ad44ac082fdff7ee57fe125432f7d9d7cb610a23. > > This patch restores the synchronous probing for > qcom-rpmh-regulator because asynchronous probing broke > Dragonboard 845c (SDM845) running AOSP. UFSHC fail to > initialize properly and DB845c fails to boot regardless > of "rootwait" bootarg being present or not > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5975. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c > index b0a58c62b1e2..30659922b0aa 100644 > --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c > +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c > @@ -1517,7 +1517,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rpmh_regulator_match_table); > static struct platform_driver rpmh_regulator_driver = { > .driver = { > .name = "qcom-rpmh-regulator", > - .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS, > + .probe_type = PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS, > .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(rpmh_regulator_match_table), > }, > .probe = rpmh_regulator_probe, Amit, just wondering: what happened to this? It seems there was some agreement to go down this route to fix your regression, but then nothing happened anymore since about a week. Or am I missing something? Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. #regzbot ^backmonitor: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMi1Hd1avQDcDQf137m2auz2znov4XL8YGrLZsw5edb-NtRJRw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
