On 5/22/2023 7:23 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
quic_mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 11 May 2023 19:00:16 +0530:This change will add exec_ops support for READ, WRITE, and ERASE command. Co-developed-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Change in [v2] * Missed to post Cover-letter, so posting v2 patch with cover-letter drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c index 8717d5086f80..14ab21a4771b 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c @@ -1765,7 +1765,8 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, int ret, reg_off = FLASH_BUF_ACC, read_loc = 0; int raw_cw = cw;- nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);+ chip->cont_read.ongoing = false;This should be checked once for all by the core at startup, that's when you can tell the core continuous read is not supported by the controller.
Sure, Will fix this in next patch V3.
+ nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, data_buf, mtd->writesize); host->use_ecc = false;if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)@@ -2182,14 +2183,24 @@ static void qcom_nandc_codeword_fixup(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int page) static int qcom_nandc_read_page(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page) { + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip); struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip); + struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc; u8 *data_buf, *oob_buf = NULL;if (host->nr_boot_partitions)qcom_nandc_codeword_fixup(host, page);- nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);+ chip->cont_read.ongoing = false; + nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, buf, mtd->writesize); + nandc->buf_count = 0; + nandc->buf_start = 0; + host->use_ecc = true; + clear_read_regs(nandc); + set_address(host, 0, page); + update_rw_regs(host, ecc->steps, true, 0); + data_buf = buf; oob_buf = oob_required ? chip->oob_poi : NULL;@@ -2259,6 +2270,10 @@ static int qcom_nandc_write_page(struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf, nand_prog_page_begin_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0); + set_address(host, 0, page);+ nandc->buf_count = 0; + nandc->buf_start = 0; + clear_read_regs(nandc); clear_bam_transaction(nandc);@@ -3081,7 +3096,38 @@ static int qcom_read_status_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, static int qcom_erase_cmd_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_subop *subop){ - return 0; + struct qcom_nand_host *host = to_qcom_nand_host(chip); + struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip); + struct qcom_op q_op; + int ret = 0; + + qcom_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &q_op); + + q_op.cmd_reg |= PAGE_ACC | LAST_PAGE; + + pre_command(host, NAND_CMD_ERASE1);The instruction is up to the caller, not to the driver. If no other instruction rather than NAND_CMD_ERASE1 can be used with this pattern, then it should be properly described (see the Arasan controller, anfc_check_op()).
Thanks, will fix this in next patch V3.
+ + nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_FLASH_CMD, q_op.cmd_reg); + nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_ADDR0, q_op.addr1_reg); + nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_ADDR1, q_op.addr2_reg); + nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV0_CFG0, + host->cfg0_raw & ~(7 << CW_PER_PAGE)); + nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_DEV0_CFG1, host->cfg1_raw); + nandc_set_reg(chip, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1); + + write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 3, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL); + write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV0_CFG0, 2, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL); + write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL); + + ret = submit_descs(nandc); + if (ret) + dev_err(nandc->dev, "failure in sbumitting reset descriptor\n"); + + free_descs(nandc); + + ret = qcom_wait_rdy_poll(chip, q_op.rdy_timeout_ms); + + return ret; }static int qcom_param_page_type_exec(struct nand_chip *chip, const struct nand_subop *subop)Thanks, Miquèl