On 16/05/2023 19:44, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 13/05/2023 12:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 12/05/2023 23:17, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> Specify clocks used by the LCC device on the MDM9615 platform. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi | 16 +++++++++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi >>> index b40c52ddf9b4..556abe90cf5b 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi >>> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ cpu-pmu { >>> }; >>> >>> clocks { >>> - cxo_board { >>> + cxo_board: cxo_board { >> >> Maybe it is possible now to change the node name to cxo-board-clk? > > This would break compatibility with the possible drivers using > "cxo_board" sys name. It seems this is the last platform using old > bindings. Let's probably settle that for 6.6 I can go and rename all > fixed clock nodes. Would that work for you? > Yes, sure. Best regards, Krzysztof