Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDX75 pincontrol driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/11/2023 10:16 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 08:30:25PM +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
Add initial Qualcomm SDX75 pinctrl driver to support pin configuration
with pinctrl framework for SDX75 SoC.
While at it, reordering the SDX65 entry.

Nice, some comment below.

Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[..]
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdx75.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdx75.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f95c0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdx75.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1595 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include "pinctrl-msm.h"
+
+#define REG_BASE 0x100000
We typically reference the inner TLMM block and omit this offset... But
I don't have a strong opinion.

[..]

+enum sdx75_functions {
+	msm_mux_gpio,
Please sort these alphabetically.

+	msm_mux_eth0_mdc,
[..]
+	msm_mux__,
+};
+
[..]
+static const struct pinfunction sdx75_functions[] = {
+	MSM_PIN_FUNCTION(gpio),
+	MSM_PIN_FUNCTION(eth0_mdc),
Please sort these alphabetically, and please squash individual pins into
their functional group.

[..]
+	MSM_PIN_FUNCTION(qup_se0_l0),
+	MSM_PIN_FUNCTION(qup_se0_l1),
+	MSM_PIN_FUNCTION(qup_se0_l2),
+	MSM_PIN_FUNCTION(qup_se0_l3),
E.g. this forces the DT writer to write individual -pins for each
signal. Better keep it "qup_se0" and the author is free to group the
pins in their states as they need (and as you know you don't need to
specify all pins for a given function).

[..]
+};
+
+/* Every pin is maintained as a single group, and missing or non-existing pin
+ * would be maintained as dummy group to synchronize pin group index with
+ * pin descriptor registered with pinctrl core.
+ * Clients would not be able to request these dummy pin groups.
+ */
Please omit this comment.

+static const struct msm_pingroup sdx75_groups[] = {
[..]
+	[16] = PINGROUP(16, pri_mi2s_ws, qup_se2_l2, qup_se1_l2_mirb, qdss_cti,
+			qdss_cti, _, _, _, _, _),
Please break the rules and leave these lines unwrapped.

+	[17] = PINGROUP(17, pri_mi2s_data0, qup_se2_l3, qup_se1_l3_mirb,
+			qdss_cti, qdss_cti, _, _, _, _, _),
[..]
+	[131] = PINGROUP(131, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _),
+	[132] =	PINGROUP(132, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _),
+	[133] = SDC_QDSD_PINGROUP(sdc1_rclk, 0x19A000, 16, 0),
Lowercase hex digits please.

+	[134] = SDC_QDSD_PINGROUP(sdc1_clk, 0x19A000, 14, 6),
+	[135] = SDC_QDSD_PINGROUP(sdc1_cmd, 0x19A000, 11, 3),
+	[136] = SDC_QDSD_PINGROUP(sdc1_data, 0x19A000, 9, 0),
+	[137] = SDC_QDSD_PINGROUP(sdc2_clk, 0x19B000, 14, 6),
+	[138] = SDC_QDSD_PINGROUP(sdc2_cmd, 0x19B000, 11, 3),
+	[139] = SDC_QDSD_PINGROUP(sdc2_data, 0x19B000, 9, 0),
+};
[..]
+static const struct of_device_id sdx75_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx75-tlmm", .data = &sdx75_pinctrl },
+	{ }
+};
+
[..]
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI sdx75 pinctrl driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdx75_pinctrl_of_match);
Keep the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() just below the sdx75_pinctrl_of_match
please, so future readers doesn't need to search for it.
Will update all the comments in the next patch version.

Thanks for reviewing,
Rohit
Regards,
Bjorn



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux