On 10/05/2023 08:47, Luca Weiss wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Fri Apr 7, 2023 at 10:27 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 07/04/2023 09:45, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> Like other Qualcomm PMICs the PM7250B can be used on different addresses >>> on the SPMI bus. Use similar defines like the PMK8350 to make this >>> possible. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- >>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>> index daa6f1d30efa..eeb476edc79a 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm7250b.dtsi >>> @@ -7,6 +7,15 @@ >>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> >>> #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> >>> >>> +/* This PMIC can be configured to be at different SIDs */ >>> +#ifndef PM7250B_SID >>> + #define PM7250B_SID 2 >> >> Drop indentation, although anyway I am against this. Please don't bring >> new patterns of this at least till we settle previous discussion. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/46658cbb-fff5-e98b-fdad-88fa683a9c75@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > What's the outcome of the discussion? For this PMIC it's totally enough > to have the SID configurable like in this patch, I don't think this PMIC > will be included twice in a board - at least I'm not aware of such a > configuration. We did not reach consensus and I still disagree with complex macros or macros depending on order of inclusion. Best regards, Krzysztof
