On 4/22/2023 5:35 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 15:51, Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The IPQ9574 platform has 4 Gen3 PCIe controllers: two single-lane and two dual-lane based on SNPS core 5.70a The Qcom IP rev is 1.27.0 and Synopsys IP rev is 5.80a Added a new compatible 'qcom,pcie-ipq9574' and 'ops_1_27_0' which reuses all the members of 'ops_2_9_0' except for the post_init as the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE configuration differs between 2_9_0 and 1_27_0. Also, modified get_resources of 'ops 2_9_0' to get the clocks from the device tree and modelled the post init sequence as a common function to avoid code redundancy. Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in V3: - Rebased on top of linux-next/master drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c index 4ab30892f6ef..3682ecdead1f 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ /* PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE register value */ #define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ 0x10000000 +#define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ_1_27_0 0x08000000 /* PARF_MHI_CLOCK_RESET_CTRL register fields */ #define AHB_CLK_EN BIT(0) @@ -202,10 +203,10 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 { struct reset_control *rst; }; -#define QCOM_PCIE_2_9_0_MAX_CLOCKS 5 struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 { - struct clk_bulk_data clks[QCOM_PCIE_2_9_0_MAX_CLOCKS]; + struct clk_bulk_data *clks; struct reset_control *rst; + int num_clks; }; union qcom_pcie_resources { @@ -1050,17 +1051,10 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_9_0; struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci; struct device *dev = pci->dev; - int ret; - res->clks[0].id = "iface"; - res->clks[1].id = "axi_m"; - res->clks[2].id = "axi_s"; - res->clks[3].id = "axi_bridge"; - res->clks[4].id = "rchng"; - - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; + res->num_clks = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &res->clks); + if (res->clks < 0) + return res->num_clks; res->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev); if (IS_ERR(res->rst)) @@ -1073,7 +1067,7 @@ static void qcom_pcie_deinit_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) { struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_9_0; - clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks); + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(res->num_clks, res->clks); } static int qcom_pcie_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) @@ -1102,19 +1096,16 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) usleep_range(2000, 2500); - return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks); + return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(res->num_clks, res->clks); } -static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) +static int qcom_pcie_post_init(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) { struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci; u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); u32 val; int i; - writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ, - pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE); - val = readl(pcie->parf + PARF_PHY_CTRL); val &= ~PHY_TEST_PWR_DOWN; writel(val, pcie->parf + PARF_PHY_CTRL); @@ -1151,6 +1142,26 @@ static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) return 0; } +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) +{ + writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ_1_27_0, + pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE); + + qcom_pcie_post_init(pcie); + + return 0; +} + +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie) +{ + writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ, + pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE); + + qcom_pcie_post_init(pcie); + + return 0; +}I'm not sure about moving the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE initialization from init() to post_init(). Probably a better solution might be to have two init() callbacks and to call the common function from both of them.
Hi Dmitry, Originally, the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE initialization was done part of post_init() callback only and we haven't moved it from init() to post_init().We have just added two post_init() callbacks to handle the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE initialization accordingly for 1_27_0 and 2_9_0. Thanks, Devi Priya
+ static int qcom_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) { u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP); @@ -1291,6 +1302,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_2_9_0 = { .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable, }; +/* Qcom IP rev.: 1.27.0 Synopsys IP rev.: 5.80a */ +static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_1_27_0 = { + .get_resources = qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0, + .init = qcom_pcie_init_2_9_0, + .post_init = qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0, + .deinit = qcom_pcie_deinit_2_9_0, + .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable, +}; + static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_0_0 = { .ops = &ops_1_0_0, }; @@ -1323,6 +1343,10 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_2_9_0 = { .ops = &ops_2_9_0, }; +static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_27_0 = { + .ops = &ops_1_27_0, +}; + static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { .link_up = qcom_pcie_link_up, .start_link = qcom_pcie_start_link, @@ -1607,6 +1631,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2", .data = &cfg_2_1_0 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074", .data = &cfg_2_3_3 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3", .data = &cfg_2_9_0 }, + { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq9574", .data = &cfg_1_27_0 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-msm8996", .data = &cfg_2_3_2 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-qcs404", .data = &cfg_2_4_0 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sa8540p", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 }, -- 2.17.1
