Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: change clk_ops' ->round_rate() prototype

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi folks

just a brief comment on this one:

On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:

> Clock rates are stored in an unsigned long field, but ->round_rate()
> (which returns a rounded rate from a requested one) returns a long
> value (errors are reported using negative error codes), which can lead
> to long overflow if the clock rate exceed 2Ghz.
> 
> Change ->round_rate() prototype to return 0 or an error code, and pass the
> requested rate as a pointer so that it can be adjusted depending on
> hardware capabilities.

...

> diff --git a/Documentation/clk.txt b/Documentation/clk.txt
> index 0e4f90a..fca8b7a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/clk.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/clk.txt
> @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ the operations defined in clk.h:
>  		int		(*is_enabled)(struct clk_hw *hw);
>  		unsigned long	(*recalc_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  						unsigned long parent_rate);
> -		long		(*round_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw,
> -						unsigned long rate,
> +		int		(*round_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +						unsigned long *rate,
>  						unsigned long *parent_rate);
>  		long		(*determine_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw,
>  						unsigned long rate,

I'd suggest that we should probably go straight to 64-bit rates.  There 
are already plenty of clock sources that can generate rates higher than 
4GiHz.


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux