On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 03:50:16AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 8.03.2023 22:35, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > Keepalive clocks for other platforms were gathered by digging in old > > downstream kernels, please give them a test. > I have an implementation of rpmcc-within-icc ready(ish) locally. Turns out > some SoCs need a keepalive (19.2MHz, active-only) vote on clocks that > are NOT governed by interconnect.. So before we can disable clocks, > both will need to be implemented.. ugh... I was hoping we could avoid > having it in rpmcc.. > Can you give an example? Which clocks are affected on which SoC? Thanks, Stephan
