Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: drop duplicated GPIO watchdog bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:26:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/04/2023 18:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 4/15/23 02:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Two conversions to DT schema of GPIO watchdog binding happened and came
> >> through different trees.  Merge them into one:
> >> 1. Combine maintainers,
> >> 2. Use more descriptive property descriptions and constraints from
> >>     gpio-wdt.yaml,
> >> 3. Switch to unevaluatedProperties:false, to allow generic watchdog
> >>     properties.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > 
> > For the series:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > On a side note, the e-mail addresses in patchwork are messed up for
> > patches sent by you. As result, I can not reply to your e-mails after
> > pulling a patch from patchwork. This means that some replies get lost
> > if I did not keep the original e-mail.
> > 
> > That is how it looks like after I pull one of your patches from patchwork:
> > 
> > To:
> > +=?unknown-8bit?q?Wim_Van_Sebroeck_=3Cwim=40linux-watchdog=2Eorg=3E=2C_Gu?==?unknown-8bit?q?enter_Roeck_=3Clinux=40roeck-us=2Enet=3E=2C_Rob_Herring_?==?unknown-8bit?q?=3Crobh+dt=40kernel=2Eorg=3E=2C_Krzysztof_Kozlowski_=3Ckrz?==?unknown-8bit?q?yszt
> 
> (Trimmed cc list)
> 
> Thanks for letting me know, I wonder what's the problem. I am sending
> with send-email exactly the same way every day, but somehow this series
> have such header in Patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230415095112.51257-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Which I do not see in:
> 1. lore:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230415095112.51257-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> 2. Previous patches on Patchwork:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/patch/20230310223012.315897-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Lore (1 above) points to possible unescaped UTF character for
> rafal@xxxxxxxxxx, but I wonder why send-email did not handle it.

Looks to me like Content-Type header is missing. Usually, I get a prompt 
from git-send-email with what encoding to use if it needs to use UTF8.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux