On 2023-04-17 18:54:18, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
> On 4/17/2023 4:14 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > Some of these members were initialized while never read, while others
> > were not even assigned any value at all. Drop them to save some space,
> > and above all confusion when looking at these members.
> >
> > Fixes: 25fdd5933e4c ("drm/msm: Add SDM845 DPU support")
> > Fixes: 84a33d0fd921 ("drm/msm/dpu: add dpu_hw_wb abstraction for writeback blocks")
> > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> It seems like WB UBWC formats are not supported today. Because otherwise
> ctx->mdp would be used for writeback. I guess we can add a ubwc member
> similar to hw_sspp, when we do add the support for this. Hence this is,
That seems preferable to me. SSPP does the same in patch 3/3, and I
have been thinking to replace the dpu_mdss_cfg *catalog parameter in
dpu_hw_sspp_init with just the ubwc cfg pointer. Likewise
dpu_hw_ctl_init also takes the full dpu_mdss_cfg only to take out the
mixers.
- Marijn
> Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
