On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:21 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > As far as I can see, in next-20150519, drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c lacks > the required module specific boilerplate for this to be useful. Is that > boilerplate added in another series? I need to rephrase this. Let me try again. As far as I can see, in next-20150519, drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c lacks a MODULE_LICENSE() macro. Without that macro loading the module should trigger a warning and taint the kernel, right? By the way, as far as I can see, this (new) module can only be loaded manually (or via scripts). Is that what people want? Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
