2015-05-18 0:54 GMT+09:00 Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> LCC (Line Control Command) are being used for communication between
> UFS host and UFS device.
> New commercial UFS devices don't have the issues with LCC processing
> but UFS host controller might still have the issue with LCC processing,
> hence, added a routine to disable TX LCC on the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 9641bcb..3e57cca 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -2640,6 +2640,42 @@ static int ufshcd_hba_enable(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ufshcd_disable_tx_lcc(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool peer)
> +{
> + int tx_lanes, i, err = 0;
> +
> + if (!peer)
> + ufshcd_dme_get(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_CONNECTEDTXDATALANES),
> + &tx_lanes);
> + else
> + ufshcd_dme_peer_get(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB(PA_CONNECTEDTXDATALANES),
> + &tx_lanes);
> + for (i = 0; i < tx_lanes; i++) {
> + if (!peer)
> + err = ufshcd_dme_set(hba,
> + UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(TX_LCC_ENABLE,
> + UIC_ARG_MPHY_TX_GEN_SEL_INDEX(i)),
> + 0);
> + else
> + err = ufshcd_dme_peer_set(hba,
> + UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(TX_LCC_ENABLE,
> + UIC_ARG_MPHY_TX_GEN_SEL_INDEX(i)),
> + 0);
You can reduce duplication by:
err = ufshcd_dme_set_attr(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(TX_LCC_ENABLE,
UIC_ARG_MPHY_TX_GEN_SEL_INDEX(i)),
ATTR_SET_NOR, 0, peer ? DME_PEER : DME_LOCAL);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: TX LCC Disable failed, peer = %d, lane = %d, err = %d",
> + __func__, peer, i, err);
'\n' is missing in format string.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
