On 4/4/2023 5:37 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 05/04/2023 01:30, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 4/4/2023 6:05 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
These blocks are of variable length on different SoCs. Set the
correct values where I was able to retrieve it from downstream
DTs and leave the old defaults (0x280) otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
[DB: fixed some lengths, split the INTF changes away]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Everything is fine except sm8250.
DPU | SoC | INTF_DSI size
5.0 | sm8150 | 0x2bc
5.1 | sc8180x | 0x2bc
6.0 | sm8250 | 0x2c0
6.2 | sc7180 | 0x2c0
6.3 | sm6115 | 0x2c0
6.5 | qcm2290 | 0x2c0
7.0 | sm8350 | 0x2c4
7.2 | sc7280 | 0x2c4
8.0 | sc8280xp | 0x300
8.1 | sm8450 | 0x300
9.0 | sm8550 | 0x300
Today sm8250 is using the same table as sm8150 but it needs 0x2c0 and
not 0x2bc.
We should de-duplicate it add a new one for sm8250?
This is done in patch 22. It makes no sense to play with the data until
we are clear, which platform uses which instance.
Ack, that one looks fine and since this one is just preserving what was
already present, this change LGTM, hence
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
