Re: [PATCH v1 5/7] Revert "drm: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/3/23 18:17, Christian König wrote:
> Am 02.04.23 um 18:48 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>> Don't assert held dma-buf reservation lock on memory mapping of exported
>> buffer.
>>
>> We're going to change dma-buf mmap() locking policy such that exporters
>> will have to handle the lock. The previous locking policy caused deadlock
>> problem for DRM drivers in a case of self-imported dma-bufs, it's solved
>> by moving the lock down to exporters.
> 
> I only checked the TTM code path and think that at least that one should
> work fine.
> 
>> Fixes: 39ce25291871 ("drm: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf
>> mmapping")
> 
> This here is not really a "fix" for the previous patch. We just found
> that we didn't like the behavior and so reverted the original patch.
> 
> A "Reverts..." comment in the commit message would be more appropriate I
> think.

Ack, will drop the fixes tag in v2. Thank you and Emil for the review.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux