On 4/2/2023 4:27 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 31/03/2023 21:49, Jessica Zhang wrote:
Correct the math for slice_last_group_size so that it matches the
calculations downstream.
Fixes: c110cfd1753e ("drm/msm/disp/dpu1: Add support for DSC")
Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c
index b952f7d2b7f5..9312a8d7fbd9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c
@@ -56,7 +56,11 @@ static void dpu_hw_dsc_config(struct dpu_hw_dsc
*hw_dsc,
if (is_cmd_mode)
initial_lines += 1;
- slice_last_group_size = 3 - (dsc->slice_width % 3);
+ slice_last_group_size = dsc->slice_width % 3;
+
+ if (slice_last_group_size == 0)
+ slice_last_group_size = 3;
Hmm. As I went on checking this against techpack:
mod = dsc->slice_width % 3
mod | techpack | old | your_patch
0 | 2 | 3 | 3
1 | 0 | 2 | 1
2 | 1 | 1 | 2
So, obviously neither old nor new code match the calculations of the
techpack. If we assume that sde_dsc_helper code is correct (which I have
no reasons to doubt), then the proper code should be:
slice_last_group_size = (dsc->slice_width + 2) % 3;
Could you please doublecheck and adjust.
Hi Dmitry,
The calculation should match the techpack calculation (I kept the `data
|= ((slice_last_group_size - 1) << 18);` a few lines down).
Thanks,
Jessica Zhang
+
data = (initial_lines << 20);
data |= ((slice_last_group_size - 1) << 18);
/* bpp is 6.4 format, 4 LSBs bits are for fractional part */
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
