<..>
-static int server_del(struct qrtr_node *node, unsigned int port)
+static int server_del(struct qrtr_node *node, unsigned int port, bool bcast)
{
struct qrtr_lookup *lookup;
struct qrtr_server *srv;
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int server_del(struct qrtr_node *node, unsigned int port)
radix_tree_delete(&node->servers, port);
/* Broadcast the removal of local servers */
- if (srv->node == qrtr_ns.local_node)
+ if (srv->node == qrtr_ns.local_node && bcast)
service_announce_del(&qrtr_ns.bcast_sq, srv);
/* Announce the service's disappearance to observers */
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static int ctrl_cmd_bye(struct sockaddr_qrtr *from)
}
slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter);
rcu_read_unlock();
- server_del(node, srv->port);
+ server_del(node, srv->port, true);
rcu_read_lock();
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -459,10 +459,13 @@ static int ctrl_cmd_del_client(struct sockaddr_qrtr *from,
kfree(lookup);
}
- /* Remove the server belonging to this port */
+ /* Remove the server belonging to this port but don't broadcast
This is still not as per the multi line comment style perferred in kernel.
Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#commenting
Ho, i had it like first style and checkpatch cribbed. Then changed it
as per the second style for net/ format. You mean we should stick to
1 st style ?
Regards,
Sricharan
