On 3/2/2023 5:07 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 2.03.2023 08:12, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
On 2/28/2023 8:54 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
The Video Processing Unit hardware version is the differentiator,
based on which we should decide which code paths to take in hw
init. Up until now, we've relied on HFI versions, but that was
just a happy accident between recent SoCs. Add a field in the
res struct and add correlated definitions that will be used to
account for the aforementioned differences.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
index 32551c2602a9..4b785205c5b1 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h
@@ -48,6 +48,14 @@ struct bw_tbl {
u32 peak_10bit;
};
+enum vpu_version {
+ VPU_VERSION_AR50, /* VPU4 */
+ VPU_VERSION_AR50_LITE, /* VPU4.4 */
+ VPU_VERSION_IRIS1, /* VPU5 */
There was Venus3X, followed by a different generation of video hardware.
Driver just extended the versions for next generation incrementally.
Existing versions in driver are not the VPU versions, so we can drop
them from comments.
+ VPU_VERSION_IRIS2,
+ VPU_VERSION_IRIS2_1,
+};
+
struct venus_resources {
u64 dma_mask;
const struct freq_tbl *freq_tbl;
@@ -71,6 +79,7 @@ struct venus_resources {
const char * const resets[VIDC_RESETS_NUM_MAX];
unsigned int resets_num;
enum hfi_version hfi_version;
+ enum vpu_version vpu_version;
u8 num_vpp_pipes;
u32 max_load;
unsigned int vmem_id;
@@ -473,6 +482,12 @@ struct venus_inst {
#define IS_V4(core) ((core)->res->hfi_version == HFI_VERSION_4XX)
#define IS_V6(core) ((core)->res->hfi_version == HFI_VERSION_6XX)
+#define IS_AR50(core) ((core)->res->vpu_version == VPU_VERSION_AR50)
+#define IS_AR50_LITE(core) ((core)->res->vpu_version == VPU_VERSION_AR50_LITE)
+#define IS_IRIS1(core) ((core)->res->vpu_version == VPU_VERSION_IRIS1)
+#define IS_IRIS2(core) ((core)->res->vpu_version == VPU_VERSION_IRIS2)
+#define IS_IRIS2_1(core) ((core)->res->vpu_version == VPU_VERSION_IRIS2_1)
+
#define ctrl_to_inst(ctrl) \
container_of((ctrl)->handler, struct venus_inst, ctrl_handler)
Adding VPU version check seems a good idea to me. Can we remove HFI Version checks now?
If all implementations using VPU x.y *always* use the
same HFI generation for given x, y, we could.
HFIs generally does not change, so we can be sure that they would always
use the same HFI.
We might add a new interface (HFI) for a feature requirement, but always
support the existing ones.
That said, I think keeping it as-is would be convenient
from the maintainability standpoint if nothing else.. For
example functions that only appear in ancient msm-3.10
releases can be easily guarded with IS_V1 or what have you
without having to dig up all n VPU revisions.
Konrad
