On 28.03.2023 15:13, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 27-03-23, 10:49, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 27.03.2023 07:38, Vinod Koul wrote: >>> On 25-03-23, 13:34, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >>>>> + cpus { >>>>> + #address-cells = <2>; >>>>> + #size-cells = <0>; >>>>> + >>>>> + CPU0: cpu@0 { >>>>> + device_type = "cpu"; >>>>> + compatible = "qcom,kryo485"; >>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x0>; >>>> Please add clocks = <&cpufreq_hw n>; >>>> >>>>> + enable-method = "psci"; >>>>> + capacity-dmips-mhz = <602>; >>>>> + next-level-cache = <&L2_0>; >>>>> + qcom,freq-domain = <&cpufreq_hw 0>; >>> >>> You mean this or something else? >> Check >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221102065448.GA10650@thinkpad/T/ > > Good point, thanks > >>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-camnoc-virt"; >>>>> + #interconnect-cells = <2>; >>>>> + qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>; >>>>> + }; >>>>> + >>>>> + mc_virt: interconnect-mc-virt { >>>> Please be consistent with your naming. >>> >>> Are you referring to adding -0 for this? >> I'm not sure which is preferred (-n vs -name), there's a mixed bag >> upstream.. Krzysztof? > > Either ways this should be consistent, so camnoc_virt: > interconnect-camnoc_virt makes sense rather than arbitrary -0 Yeah, just remember that underscores are forbidden in node names, use hyphen instead! Konrad > >>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-mc-virt"; >>>>> + #interconnect-cells = <2>; >>>>> + qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>; >>>>> + }; >>>>> + >>>>> + qup_virt: interconnect-qup-virt { >>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-qup-virt"; >>>>> + #interconnect-cells = <2>; >>>>> + qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>; >>>>> + }; >>>>> + >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>> + reserved-memory { >>>>> + #address-cells = <2>; >>>>> + #size-cells = <2>; >>>>> + ranges; >>>>> + >>>>> + hyp_mem: hyp-region@85700000 { >>>> the -region seems a bit unnecessary in all of these nodes >>> >>> This is reserved for hyp, I think we should add it here so that we dont >>> touch this piece..? >> I meant the '-region' bit in the node names >> >> (label: name@unit-address) > > ack, thanks for clearing my misunderstanding >