On 27/03/2023 13:37, Dylan Van Assche wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Sun, 2023-03-26 at 10:55 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 25/03/2023 14:44, Dylan Van Assche wrote: >>> Document the added qcom,assign-all-memory in devicetree bindings. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dylan Van Assche <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/qcom,fastrpc.yaml | 6 >>> ++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/qcom,fastrpc.yaml >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/qcom,fastrpc.yaml >>> index 1ab9588cdd89..fa5b00534b30 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/qcom,fastrpc.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/qcom,fastrpc.yaml >>> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ properties: >>> Virtual machine IDs for remote processor. >>> $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array" >>> >>> + qcom,assign-all-mem: >>> + description: >>> + Assign memory to all Virtual machines defined by qcom,vmids. >> >> This (neither commit msg) does not explain why this is needed and >> actually does not sound like hardware-related property. > > This is made a separate property to toggle different behavior in the > driver if it is needed for some FastRPC nodes. Bindings are not for driver behavior. > Downstream does guard > this with a property 'restrict-access' as well, see [1] for a random > SDM845 downstream kernel. On SDM845, this property is not present, thus > the IF block runs. On SDM670, this property is present, then the IF > block is skipped. That's why I opt for this property to have this > behaviour conditionally. I'm not sure how to explain it better though. Still you described driver... Please come with something more hardware related. Best regards, Krzysztof