On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 12:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 26/03/2023 11:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 12:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> The soc node is supposed to have only device nodes with MMIO addresses, > >> so move the DSI OPP out of it (it is used also by second DSI1 on > >> SDM660): > > > > This raises a question: would it make sense to add /opps to handle all > > opp tables? > > We didn't add it to any other cases like this (and we already fixed all > other boards), so why now? We can but it is a bit late for it. Because nobody expressed this idea beforehand? I'm not insisting here, you have a better understanding of DT. Just wondering if it makes sense. -- With best wishes Dmitry
