Thanks Stephen for review.
On Fri, April 10, 2015 11:33 pm, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/10/15 05:19, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>> @@ -683,8 +679,7 @@ static void msm_power(struct uart_port *port,
>> unsigned int state,
>>
>> switch (state) {
>> case 0:
>> - clk_prepare_enable(msm_port->clk);
>> - clk_prepare_enable(msm_port->pclk);
>> + msm_init_clock(port);
>
> Hm... now we would call msm_serial_set_mnd_regs() whenever we power on
> the port? Presumably we only need to do that once when we probe (or when
> we resume from a sleep state that resets the registers, i.e.
> hibernation) but I guess we're getting saved by the fact that the
> if/else if pair in msm_serial_set_mnd_regs_from_uartclk would never be
> true after the first time we call it?
I tried replacing msm_init_clock() call with msm_serial_set_mnd_regs() in
msm_startup() as msm_startup gets called just after msm_power() so that
clk_prepare_enable() is followed by mnd settings. But it does not get the
kernel booted for some reason.
So, can I get a acked-by for this patch or you still think it can be done
in a better way?
>
>> break;
>> case 3:
>> clk_disable_unprepare(msm_port->clk);
>
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
