Hi, On 23.03.2023 23:08, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 3:05 PM Marek Szyprowski > <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Restore synchronous probing for 'qcom,pm8150-rpmh-regulators' because >> otherwise the UFSHC device is not properly initialized on QRB5165-RB5 >> board. >> >> Fixes: ed6962cc3e05 ("regulator: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS for drivers between 4.14 and 4.19") >> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > I don't object to this patch landing temporarily, but can you provide > any more details, please? On Qualcomm Chromebooks I'm not seeing any > issues with RPMH regulators probing asynchronously, so I can only > assume that there's a bug in the UFSHC driver that's being tickled. You are right. I've analyzed this case further and it turned out that it was my fault. In short - 'rootwait' kernel cmdline parameter was missing and root was specified as '/dev/sda7'. UFSHC driver properly retried probing after it cannot get its regulators, but it happened at the same time when kernel tried to mount rootfs. I was confused that this is really a regulator issue, because the mentioned /dev/sda* devices were properly reported as available in the system in the root mounting failure message, but adding the 'rootwait' cmdline parameter fixed this problem. It would be safe to revert this change. I'm really sorry for the false report and the noise. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland