On 17.03.2023 09:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/03/2023 12:16, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> SM6350 GPUCC uses the same clock names as the rest of the gang, except
>> without a _src suffix. Account for that.
>
> Why not fixing the names instead (to use the same)? If the clocks are
> the same, why using different names for the inputs? To remind - these
> are not names of clocks in GCC, but names of clock inputs to the device.
Considering SM6350 is the only used of SM6350_GPUCC and it's not yet
in next and I don't think any other project using devicetree has
Adreno up on any platform, let alone this one, I suppose the ABI could
be broken and the driver could be made to expect the more common set
of names? Or I could transition it to index-based lookup?
Konrad
>
>>
>> Fixes: 7b91b9d8cc6c ("dt-bindings: clock: add SM6350 QCOM Graphics clock bindings")
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml
>> index db53eb288995..d209060a619d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml
>> @@ -43,10 +43,8 @@ properties:
>> - description: GPLL0 div branch source
>>
>> clock-names:
>> - items:
>> - - const: bi_tcxo
>> - - const: gcc_gpu_gpll0_clk_src
>> - - const: gcc_gpu_gpll0_div_clk_src
>> + minItems: 3
>
> Drop minItems, not needed as it is implied by maxItems.
>
>> + maxItems: 3
>>
>> '#clock-cells':
>> const: 1
>> @@ -71,6 +69,29 @@ required:
>>
>> additionalProperties: false
>>
>>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
