> On Apr 14, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> >>>> So please come up with proper technical arguments rather than the kernel >>>> should take whatever SoC vendors dreamt of. >>> >>> There is no technical argument to be made. This is about the >>> community and you as maintainer wanting to accept code that complies >>> to your decision or not. >> >> If you are not willing to make technical arguments, I don't have to >> provide any further reasons in this thread. It's your choice. In the >> meantime, the short answer is NAK. I assume you would than NAK someone trying to get support for their Nexus 9 Tablet using a Tegra K1. It appears the shipping code for that device didn’t use PSCI (again guessing because it wasn’t available at the time). https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/tegra/+/android-tegra-flounder-3.10-lollipop-release/arch/arm64/mach-tegra/platsmp.c If so, I find this counter to the Linux kernel communities normal desire to support the most hardware platforms. - k -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
