The set_mux callback in SoC TLMM driver (pinctrl-msm.c) uses "group",
not "group_num" for the number of the pin group. Other places of
lpass-lpi also use "group", so let's be consistent for code readability.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
index 27fc8b671954..bd32556d75a5 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
@@ -84,10 +84,10 @@ static int lpi_gpio_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
}
static int lpi_gpio_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int function,
- unsigned int group_num)
+ unsigned int group)
{
struct lpi_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
- const struct lpi_pingroup *g = &pctrl->data->groups[group_num];
+ const struct lpi_pingroup *g = &pctrl->data->groups[group];
u32 val;
int i, pin = g->pin;
--
2.34.1
