On 6.03.2023 18:01, Lux Aliaga wrote: > > On 06/03/2023 13:52, Lux Aliaga wrote: >> Document the compatible for UFS found on the SM6125. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@xxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml >> index b517d76215e3..42422f3471b3 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml >> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ properties: >> - qcom,sc8280xp-ufshc >> - qcom,sdm845-ufshc >> - qcom,sm6115-ufshc >> + - qcom,sm6125-ufshc >> - qcom,sm6350-ufshc >> - qcom,sm8150-ufshc >> - qcom,sm8250-ufshc >> @@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ allOf: >> contains: >> enum: >> - qcom,sm6115-ufshc >> + - qcom,sm6125-ufshc >> then: >> properties: >> clocks: > I have to apologize. I worked on a changelog for this patchset but I skipped the subject header, therefore it didn't send, and as I realized this I interrupted the process, leaving the patchset incomplete. I'll retry sending it, this time correctly. Happens, next time resend it with a RESEND prefix, e.g. [RESEND PATCH 1/2] Konrad >
