On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, Aidan MacDonald wrote: > The usual behavior of mask registers is writing a '1' bit to > disable (mask) an interrupt; similarly, writing a '1' bit to > an unmask register enables (unmasks) an interrupt. > > Due to a longstanding issue in regmap-irq, mask and unmask > registers were inverted when both kinds of registers were > present on the same chip, ie. regmap-irq actually wrote '1's > to the mask register to enable an IRQ and '1's to the unmask > register to disable an IRQ. > > This was fixed by commit e8ffb12e7f06 ("regmap-irq: Fix > inverted handling of unmask registers") but the fix is opt-in > via mask_unmask_non_inverted = true because it requires manual > changes for each affected driver. The new behavior will become > the default once all drivers have been updated. > > The PM8008 appears to rely on the inverted behavior. It has > separate set & clear registers for a register called INT_EN, > which presumably enables interrupts by writing '1's. Opt in > to the new non-inverted behavior & swap mask_base/unmask_base. > > Signed-off-by: Aidan MacDonald <aidanmacdonald.0x0@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Applied, thanks -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]