On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 10:07:41AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2/28/23 23:31, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Instead of using a goto label to return, let's return directly in the
> > "if" condition after setting mcq_base.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 9 ++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > index 34fc453f3eb1..d90f963eed02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> > @@ -1460,8 +1460,10 @@ static int ufs_qcom_mcq_config_resource(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > /* MCQ resource provided in DT */
> > res = &hba->res[RES_MCQ];
> > /* Bail if MCQ resource is provided */
> > - if (res->base)
> > - goto out;
> > + if (res->base) {
> > + hba->mcq_base = res->base;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > /* Explicitly allocate MCQ resource from ufs_mem */
> > res_mcq = devm_kzalloc(hba->dev, sizeof(*res_mcq), GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -1489,9 +1491,6 @@ static int ufs_qcom_mcq_config_resource(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > goto ioremap_err;
> > }
> > -out:
> > - hba->mcq_base = res->base;
> > - return 0;
> > ioremap_err:
> > res->base = NULL;
> > remove_resource(res_mcq);
>
> This patch changes the behavior for the success case without mentioning this
> in the patch description. So I assume that the behavior change is
> unintentional and hence that this patch should be dropped?
>
Sorry, my bad here :( Please ignore this patch.
Thanks,
Mani
> Bart.
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
