Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm: Fix mask value of RFR level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/07/15 06:47, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> According to documents The RFR_LEVEL1 in UART_DM_MR1 can be

That is UART_DM_MR1

> programmed in bits 31:8 but the masks only bits 17:8.
> Correct the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <gpramod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> index 8f7806d..5ff9ebf 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>  #define UART_MR1			0x0000
>  
>  #define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL0	0x3F
> -#define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1	0x3FF00
> +#define UART_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1	0xFFFFFF00

But this is UART_MR1. The two hardware cores share the same driver
because the DM hardware is based on the non-DM hardware. I suppose we
need to make another #define UART_DM_MR1_AUTO_RFR_LEVEL1 and then have
an if (msm_port->is_uartdm) in msm_startup() path to handle the
differences here.

>  #define UART_MR1_RX_RDY_CTL    		(1 << 7)
>  #define UART_MR1_CTS_CTL       		(1 << 6)
>  


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux