Hi all,
On 1/16/23 13:37, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Bjorn, all,
On 1/10/23 17:17, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 14:40:29 +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote:
From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The Goodix touchscreen controller has a reset line active low. It
happens to
also be used to configure its i2c address at runtime. If the reset
line is
incorrectly asserted, the address will be wrongly configured. This
cost me a few
hours, trying to figure out why the touchscreen wouldn't work.
[...]
Applied, thanks!
[8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998-fxtec: fix touchscreen reset GPIO
polarity
commit: 8a0721dae68fdb4534e220fc9faae7a0ef2f3785
Thank you for the merge, however I think there could be some issue here.
This requires the patches 1, 2 and 3 all modifying the input driver in
order to not introduce a regression.
I mistakenly removed the RFC tag and seemingly didn't make it clear
enough that I had some question on how to properly merge this patch
series, c.f. "Do we also make this patch series only one patchset since
the DT patches depend
on the driver patch and vice-versa? In which tree would this go?" in the
cover letter.
So please, how do we go on with the rest of the patch series? Should I
submit a v4 which would be only one patch with DT and input changes all
at once and Bjorn reverts the patch they had just merged?
@Dmitry, since you would have to merge at least patches 1 to 3 in your
tree (I assume), would you be willing to take the DT patches at the same
time through your tree too? Are the appropriate device DT maintainers OK
with this?
Ping.
Cheers,
Quentin
