On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:11:42PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Thinking about it again, this seems like something that could be > generalized and introduced into regulator core.. Hardcoding this > will not end well.. Not to mention it'll affect all mp5496-using > boards that are already upstream. > WDYT about regulator-init-microvolts Mark? The overwhelming majority of devices that have variable voltages support readback, these Qualcomm firmware devices are pretty much unique in this regard. We don't want a general property to set a specific voltage since normally we should be using the constraints and don't normally need to adjust things immediately since we can tell what the current voltage is. This is pretty much just going to be a device specific bodge, ideally something that does know what the voltage is would be able to tell us at runtime but if that's not possible then there's no good options. If the initial voltage might vary based on board then a device specific DT property might be less terrible, if it's determined by the regulator the current code seems fine. Or just leave the current behavour, if the constraints are accurate then hopefully a temporary dip in voltage is just inelegant rather than an issue. Indeed the current behaviour might well save power if you've got a voltage range configured and nothing actually ever gets round to setting the voltage (which is depressingly common, people seem keen on setting voltage ranges even when the voltage is never varied in practice).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature