On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Tim Bird <tbird20d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Sorry, I can't take this without a DT ack. > > Hmmm. > > The policy seems to be: > "For driver (not subsystem) bindings: If you are comfortable with the > binding, and it hasn't received an Acked-by from the devicetree > maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it." > > The syscon property is only relative to the qcom hwspinlock driver, > (unless I'm missing something) and both Qualcomm and Sony devs are > OK with it. So while an ACK from the DT side would be nice, I don't > think it's required. This is exactly the type of delay that is really > holding up a lot of out-of-tree code. Sorry, I do prefer to make sure Mark is OK with this devicetree patch, especially since it wasn't clear whether Mark is entirely comfortable with it in his last response. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
