Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] interconnect: qcom: msm8996: Specify no bus clock scaling on A0NoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 17.02.2023 20:27, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17.02.2023 11:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> A0NoC only does bus scaling through RPM votes and does not have any
>> ICC clocks. Describe this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> This is bad, as devm_clk_get_bulk{"", _optional} doesn't
> check if num_clocks makes sense and passes "-1" down the
> devres alloc chain..
> 
> I'll rework this for the next revision by simply assigning
> the common "bus", "bus_a" set everywhere instead of relying
> on it being there by default..
Or maybe I shouldn't, as that will require redefining the array
over and over again.. Perhaps just passing <&xo_board>, <&xo_board>
to a0noc's "bus", "bus_a", similar to what's been done on SDM630's
GNoC would be less messy?

Konrad
> 
> Konrad
>>  drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c
>> index 1a5e0ad36cc4..45eb8675fb11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c
>> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8996.c
>> @@ -1817,6 +1817,7 @@ static const struct qcom_icc_desc msm8996_a0noc = {
>>  	.type = QCOM_ICC_NOC,
>>  	.nodes = a0noc_nodes,
>>  	.num_nodes = ARRAY_SIZE(a0noc_nodes),
>> +	.num_bus_clocks = -1, /* No bus clock scaling */
>>  	.intf_clocks = a0noc_intf_clocks,
>>  	.num_intf_clocks = ARRAY_SIZE(a0noc_intf_clocks),
>>  	.has_bus_pd = true,
>>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux