On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:58:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 01:44:17PM -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Elliot Berman wrote: > > > The maximum VMID for assign_mem is 63. Use a u64 to represent this > > > bitmap instead of architecture-dependent "unsigned int" which varies in > > > size on 32-bit and 64-bit platforms. > > > > > > Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> (ath10k) > > > Tested-by: Gokul krishna Krishnakumar <quic_gokukris@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > @Greg, would you mind taking this through your tree for v6.3, you > > already have a related change in fastrpc.c in your tree... > > I tried, but it doesn't apply to my char-misc tree at all: > > checking file drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 898 (offset -7 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 915 (offset -7 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 930 (offset -7 lines). > checking file drivers/misc/fastrpc.c > checking file drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/qmi.c > checking file drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 227 (offset -8 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 404 (offset -10 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 939 with fuzz 1 (offset -28 lines). > checking file drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 94. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED > checking file drivers/soc/qcom/rmtfs_mem.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 30 (offset -1 lines). > can't find file to patch at input line 167 > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h > b/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h > |index 1e449a5d7f5c..250ea4efb7cb 100644 > |--- a/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h > |+++ b/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h > -------------------------- > > What tree is this patch made against? > Sorry about that, I missed the previous changes in qcom_q6v5_pas in the remoteproc tree. Elliot said he based it on linux-next, so I expect that it will merge fine on top of -rc1, once that arrives. Regards, Bjorn