> Subject: Re: [PATCH] interconnect: Skip call into provider if initial bw is zero > > On 23-01-23 22:58:49, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > > On 23/01/2023 20:37, Mike Tipton wrote: > > > > > > This isn't actually changing it for all providers. Only for those > > > that define the get_bw() callback. Right now that's only > > > qcom/msm8974 and imx/imx. If get_bw() isn't defined, then > > > icc_node_add() defaults to INT_MAX. So, the logical behavior in that > > > case is unchanged. Which means this isn't even changing the behavior > for rpmh yet, either. > > > > Yes that adds up. > > > > Looking at the commit for get_bw() for the 8974, I think this change > > would be OK with the intent of this commit > > > > commit 9caf2d956cfa254c6d89c5f4d7b3f8235d75b28f > > Author: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon Nov 9 14:45:12 2020 +0200 > > > > @Abel what effect will skipping pre->aggregation() have on i.MX ? > > I don't think there is any impact on i.MX platforms. > > Peng, any input? Thanks for CC me. No impact on i.MX. Thanks, Peng. > > > > > --- > > bod
