On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:26:09AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 11:37 -0600, Gilad Avidov wrote: > >> pmic_arb v2 has no support for spmi non-data commands and thus > >> returns -EOPNOTSUPP on .cmd callback. This causes a failure in > >> spmi_drv_probe() which sends a wakeup command to the slave before > >> probing its driver. This patchset removes the wakeup from > >> spmi_drv_probe() since the spmi spec stipulates that a slaves > >> default state is active and doesn't need a wakeup. > >> > >> Changes from v3 to v4: > >> * Remove the claim that this is a bug fix off the commit text > >> * Unmap the core register space as soon as we know that it will not be used > >> * Assign the core reg space to a local until we know if it appropriate to use > >> it to configure the controller fields (on v1) or unmap it (on v2). > >> > >> Changes from v4 to v5: > >> * remove the unmap added in v4 since it is used again and the mapping is managed. > >> * correct printf formatting for 64bit compilers. > >> * correct base address for reading the channel table. > >> > >> Gilad Avidov (2): > >> spmi: remove wakeup command before slave probe > >> spmi: pmic_arb: add support for hw version 2 > > > > Thank you Gilad. This is fine now. Tested on APQ8084 > > (controller v1) and MSM8916 (controller v2). > > > > I am wandering which is the appropriate tree to merge this? > > > > Kumar? > > We’ve been asking Greg to pick up SPMI patches. Yes, I can take them. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
