Re: [PATCH 00/13] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/2023 17:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
> patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
> there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.
> 

This patchset will conflict with:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126230319.3977109-2-dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx/

In few places it actually re-does Dmitry's patch, so probably we should
both come with unified solution.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux