On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:50 AM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +#define DRIVE_STRENGTH 9 > > +#define DRIVE_STRENGTH_UA 10 > > > > drive-strength = <8>; // 8mA drive strength > > > > bias-type = <DRIVE_STRENGTH>; > > > > OK where do I put my 8 mA now? > > > If you look at the 2/2 patch, this property only reads BIAS_ > values, which can't coexist anyway. Well the DT bindings have to be consistent and clear on their own, no matter how Linux implements it. But I'm sure you can make YAML verification such that it is impossible to use both schemes at the same time, and it's not like I don't understand what you're getting at. What I need as input is mainly the DT bindings people opinion on introducing another orthogonal way of doing something that is already possible to do another way, just more convenient. Because that is essentially what is happening here. Yours, Linus Walleij
