On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 15:21, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 30.01.2023 15:19, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Jamie,
> >
> > On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 06:53, Jamie Douglass <jamiemdouglass@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> A previously committed reserved memory region was overlapping with the
> >
> > IMHO there should be marked commit which you're fixing:
> > Fixes: 22c7e1a0fa45 ("arm64: dts: msm8992-bullhead: add memory hole region")
> Yes
>
> >
> >> SMEM memory region, causing an error message in dmesg:
> >> OF: reserved mem: OVERLAP DETECTED!
> >> reserved@5000000 (0x0000000005000000--0x0000000007200000)
> >> overlaps with smem_region@6a00000
> >> (0x0000000006a00000--0x0000000006c00000)
> >> This patch splits the previous reserved memory region into two
> >> reserved sections either side of the SMEM memory region.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@xxxxxxx>
> > ...
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8992-lg-bullhead.dtsi
> >> @@ -53,8 +53,13 @@ cont_splash_mem: memory@3400000 {
> >> no-map;
> >> };
> >>
> >> - removed_region: reserved@5000000 {
> >> - reg = <0 0x05000000 0 0x2200000>;
> >> + reserved@5000000 {
> > Can we keep "removed_region:" ?
> > removed_region: reserved@5000000 {
> >
> >> + reg = <0x0 0x05000000 0x0 0x1a00000>;
> >> + no-map;
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + reserved@6c00000 {
> > Not sure which label to add, maybe append 2?
> > removed_region2: reserved@6c00000 {
> > @Konrad @Krzysztof WDYT?
> Generally, if you don't expect that there'll be a need to
> amend/reference the node from somewhere else, the label is
> rather useless..
Thank you for info. To be honest I have no idea. Previously the label
was added, but that does not mean that it's used.
'git grep -l removed_region' shows only labels in few dts/dtsi, IMHO
it's not used. IMHO it looks ok to avoid it.
Kind regards,
Petr
>
> Konrad
>
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Petr
> >
> >> + reg = <0x0 0x06c00000 0x0 0x400000>;
> >> no-map;
> >> };
> >> };
