Re: [PATCH 6/6] regulator: qcom_smd: Add support to define the bootup voltage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 1/13/2023 9:07 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:


On 13.01.2023 16:03, devi priya wrote:
Kernel does not know the initial voltage set by the bootloaders.
During regulator registration, the voltage variable is just declared
and it is zero. Based on that, the regulator framework considers current
the voltage as zero and tries to bring up each regulator to minimum
the supported voltage.

This introduces a dip in the voltage during kernel boot and gets
stabilized once the voltage scaling comes into picture.

To avoid the voltage dip, adding support to define the
bootup voltage set by the boodloaders and based on it, regulator
framework understands that proper voltage is already set

Co-developed-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Or maybe hook it up to the spmi_regulator_common_get_voltage()
from the SPMI regulator driver and read the real voltage instead
of relying on hardcoded values thay may differ between boards?

Konrad
In IPQ9574, SPMI regulator is not used. We are using RPM-Glink communication and the regulators are controlled by RPM. In this case, we don't have an option to readback the bootup voltage and so, we have hardcoded the values

  drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c | 6 +++++-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
index 1eb17d378897..49a36b07397c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom_smd-regulator.c
@@ -800,6 +800,7 @@ struct rpm_regulator_data {
  	u32 id;
  	const struct regulator_desc *desc;
  	const char *supply;
+	int boot_uV; /* To store the bootup voltage set by bootloaders */
  };
static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_mp5496_regulators[] = {
@@ -809,7 +810,7 @@ static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_mp5496_regulators[] = {
  };
static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_ipq9574_mp5496_regulators[] = {
-	{ "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &ipq9574_mp5496_smpa1, "s1" },
+	{ "s1", QCOM_SMD_RPM_SMPA, 1, &ipq9574_mp5496_smpa1, "s1", 875000 },
  	{}
  };
@@ -1394,6 +1395,9 @@ static int rpm_regulator_init_vreg(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg, struct device *dev
  	vreg->type	= rpm_data->type;
  	vreg->id	= rpm_data->id;
+ if (rpm_data->boot_uV)
+		vreg->uV = rpm_data->boot_uV;
+
  	memcpy(&vreg->desc, rpm_data->desc, sizeof(vreg->desc));
  	vreg->desc.name = rpm_data->name;
  	vreg->desc.supply_name = rpm_data->supply;
Best Regards,
Devi Priya



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux