On 1/27/2023 5:50 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 8:21 PM Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/10/2023 3:12 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 1:36 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 09/01/2023 23:00, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 9:12 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 20/12/2022 18:20, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On 12/20/2022 8:00 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:30:32AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On 12/16/2022 7:49 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 04:59:17PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Add compatibles for the Pro SKU of the sc7280 CRD boards
which come with a Pro variant of the qcard.
The Pro qcard variant has smps9 from pm8350c ganged up with
smps7 and smps8.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v4 changes:
Added the zoglin-sku1536 compatible along with hoglin-sku1536.
Zoglin is same as the Hoglin variant, with the SPI Flash reduced
from 64MB to 8MB
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
index 1b5ac6b02bc5..07771d4c91bd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
@@ -558,6 +558,12 @@ properties:
- const: google,hoglin
- const: qcom,sc7280
+ - description: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. sc7280 CRD Pro
platform (newest rev)
+ items:
+ - const: google,zoglin-sku1536
+ - const: google,hoglin-sku1536
Is there actually such a thing as a 'hoglin-sku1536', i.e. the Pro
qcard
with 64MB of SPI flash, or do they all have 8MB of flash?
The SPI flash is on the CRD mother-board and not on the qcards, so if
you replace
the qcards on the CRDs with 64MB flash you would need the
hoglin-sku1536 to
boot on those.
With such a configuration how does the bootloader know it should pass
the kernel
the device tree for 'hoglin-sku1536' (pro) and not the non-pro
variant? IIUC the
device tree is selected based on pin strappings on the mother-board,
not the
qcard.
The device tree is selected based on the pin strappings _and_ additional
logic
to dynamically identify modem/non-modem(wifi) as well as pro/non-pro
SKUs which
was added in the bootloaders.
Just to clarify things, when you mention pro SKU, is it a separate SoC
revision (like sc7280-pro vs bare sc7280), or is it a CRD revision (CRD
Pro vs bare CRD)?
I guess Rajendra never responded, but since I know the answer: it's a
Thanks Doug for the clarifications, I seem to have missed responding to this
once I was back from vacation,
different SoC revision. ...but the SoC in this case is on a daughter
card, so you could remove the daughter card containing the SoC and put
a new daughtercard on. That would have the effect of making an old CRD
revision have the new Pro SKU SoC.
So, this is a new SoC. Is it 100% compatible with the sc7280? In other
words: does it require any additional customizations (in OPP tables, in
frequences, speed bins, etc)?
Yes, the OPP differences are taken care of with no changes needed in kernel.
We describe a superset of *all* OPPs supported by a SoC family in DT and the
cpufreq driver then queries the firmware for supported OPPs on a given
SoC variant and ends up disabling the rest.
I saw that Bjorn just send out a pull request but it didn't include
this patch. Bjorn: are you expecting anything from Rajendra here, or
did it just get missed? I think Rajendra responded to all of Dmitry's
comments, but I could be mistaken.
Yes, there is nothing outstanding for these patches, they should be good
to go, Bjorn can they be pulled in?
-Doug
