Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Add MSM8939 SoC support with two devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/01/2023 12:49, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
- Adds gcc dsi1pll and dsi1pllbyte to gcc clock list.
   Reviewing the silicon documentation we see dsi0_phy_pll is used to clock
   GCC_BYTE1_CFG_RCGR : SRC_SEL
   Root Source Select
   000 : cxo
   001 : dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk
   010 : GPLL0_OUT_AUX
   011 : gnd
   100 : gnd
   101 : gnd
   110 : gnd
   111 : reserved - Stephan/Bryan

I'm confused. Are you not contradicting yourself here? You say that
dsi0_phy_pll (dsi ZERO) is used to clock GCC_BYTE1_CFG_RCGR. Then why
do you add dsi1_phy_pll (dsi ONE) to the gcc clock list?

So my understanding of the clock tree here is that dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk is a legacy name.

Its perfectly possible to have DSI0 and DSI0_PHY switched off and to have DSI1/DSI1_PHY operable.

dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk is perhaps an unfortunate name and probably should have been renamed.

To me this looks like a confirmation of what downstream does, that both
DSI byte clocks are actually sourced from the dsi0_phy and the PLL of

A better name would have been dsiX_phy_pll_out_byteclk.

---
bod



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux