A619_holi is implemented on at least two SoCs: SM4350 (holi) and SM6375
(blair). This is what seems to be a first occurrence of this happening,
but it's easy to overcome by guarding the SoC-specific fuse values with
of_machine_is_compatible(). Do just that to enable frequency limiting
on these SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index 452ba32699b2..89990bec897f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -2091,6 +2091,34 @@ static u32 a618_get_speed_bin(u32 fuse)
return UINT_MAX;
}
+static u32 a619_holi_get_speed_bin(u32 fuse)
+{
+ /*
+ * There are (at least) two SoCs implementing A619_holi: SM4350 (holi)
+ * and SM6375 (blair). Limit the fuse matching to the corresponding
+ * SoC to prevent bogus frequency setting (as improbable as it may be,
+ * given unexpected fuse values are.. unexpected! But still possible.)
+ */
+
+ if (fuse == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (of_machine_is_compatible("qcom,sm4350")) {
+ if (fuse == 138)
+ return 1;
+ else if (fuse == 92)
+ return 2;
+ } else if (of_machine_is_compatible("qcom,sm6375")) {
+ if (fuse == 190)
+ return 1;
+ else if (fuse == 177)
+ return 2;
+ } else
+ pr_warn("Unknown SoC implementing A619_holi!\n");
+
+ return UINT_MAX;
+}
+
static u32 a619_get_speed_bin(u32 fuse)
{
if (fuse == 0)
@@ -2150,6 +2178,9 @@ static u32 fuse_to_supp_hw(struct device *dev, struct adreno_rev rev, u32 fuse)
if (adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 8, ANY_ID), rev))
val = a618_get_speed_bin(fuse);
+ else if (adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, 1), rev))
+ val = a619_holi_get_speed_bin(fuse);
+
else if (adreno_cmp_rev(ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, ANY_ID), rev))
val = a619_get_speed_bin(fuse);
--
2.39.1
