Re: [PATCH v1 00/14] add display port DSC feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/01/2023 20:24, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
This patch add DSC related supporting functions into to both dp controller and dpu enccoder

Kuogee Hsieh (14):
   drm/msm/dp: add dpcd read of both dsc and fec capability
   drm/msm/dp: add dsc factor into calculation of supported bpp
   drm/msm/dp: add configure mainlink_levels base on lane number
   drm/msm/dp: correct configure Colorimetry Indicator Field at MISC0
   drm/msm/dp: upgrade tu calculation base on newest algorithm
   drm/msm/dp: add display compression related struct
   drm/msm/dp: add dsc helper functions
   drm/msm/dp: add dsc supporting functions to DP controller
   drm/msm/dsi: export struct msm_compression_info to dpu encoder
   drm/msm/disp/dpu: add supports of DSC encoder v1.2 engine
   drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add supports of new flush mechanism
   drm/msm/disp/dpu1: revise timing engine programming to work for DSC
   drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add dsc supporting functions to dpu encoder
   drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add sc7280 dsc block and sub block

Some generic notes regarding the series. I understand that the the series is complex, but following points might ease both your work and the review proces.

First, atomicity. If your commit message says 'do this and that', it is highly likely that the patch should be split into smaller parts.

Second, please pay attention to the history. If some part of the code or the data structure was removed, you have to justify bringing it back. This is extremely important in your case, as significant parts of the code come from the vendor code, thut it is easy to step on the same rake again. And if the previous removal was incorrect, please describe why.

If we went through 10 revisions of a patch a year ago, it's not worth sending again a patch that closely remedies one of early iterations. It doesn't stand a chance of getting through.

Next. Obvious item. ./scripts/checkpatch.pl should be your friend. It is not.

Last, but not least. Please follow the mailing list. Less than a week ago one of reviews pointed out that commit messages like 'this patch does this and that' are not really welcomed. By sending the same kind of commit messages, you stand a high chance of receiveing the same response. Please go through the recommendations in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.


  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile                       |   2 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_dsc_helper.c     | 537 +++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_dsc_helper.h     |  25 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c        | 341 +++++++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h        |   4 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h   |   7 +-
  .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c   |  43 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c     |  50 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h     |  74 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c         |  43 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h         |  21 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.c         |  23 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc.h         |  23 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.c     | 371 +++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_intf.c        | 132 ++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_intf.h        |  10 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_pingpong.h    |   3 +
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_top.h         |   6 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c            |  10 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c             |  10 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c                | 176 ++++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.h                |  97 ++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_ctrl.c                   | 839 ++++++++++++++-------
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c                |  61 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_link.c                   |  29 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.c                  | 749 +++++++++++++++++-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_panel.h                  |  67 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_reg.h                    |  40 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.c                      |   3 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h                      |   3 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c                 |  14 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h                      | 113 ++-
  32 files changed, 3429 insertions(+), 497 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_dsc_helper.c
  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_dsc_helper.h
  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_dsc_1_2.c


--
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux