On 23.01.2023 13:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/01/2023 13:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> >> >> On 23.01.2023 10:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> There is no point to allow selecting pin-controller drivers for Qualcomm >>> ARMv7 SoCs when building ARM64 kernel, and vice versa. This makes >>> kernel configuration more difficult as many do not remember the Qualcomm >>> SoCs model names/numbers. There won't be a single image for ARMv7 and >>> ARMv8/9 SoCs, so no features/options are lost. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> Not sure about the newest of the newest SoCs with Cortex-X etc, >> but older ones, particularly including 8916 (as some vendors >> in their infinite wisdom decided that shipping a 32 bit tz is >> a good idea) having ARM || ARM64 would make sense. > > Why? ARM || ARM64 is implied by ARCH_QCOM, so what would it give? Err.. my mistake.. I skipped over your patch too quickly and didn't notice you did not in fact touch 8916.. Sorry.. Konrad > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
